stockpickin’


This weekend I looked at daily charts for every ticker in the S&P 500. A sort of eyes-on stock screening, if you will. I was looking for good short setups, and there are many, but this post will focus on one type of setup only: the simple and recent break of a ticker’s rally trendline.

I’m not expecting fireworks and meltdowns this week, but rather further development of the destabilizing and weakness we’ve seen over the last 2 weeks. Bullishness abounds still, and plenty of participants (or would-be participants) are still willing to get in on the upward action, even if it appears to have stalled for the moment. I still expect dips to be bought, and “consolidation” and “profit-taking” to be the bromides applied to any further downside movement in the immediate future.

Everything I say here could of course be absolutely wrong, but after watching closely and trading very lightly over the last few weeks, I am convinced that weakness is coming in. The $SPY chart (see yesterday’s post if you need one to look at) would appear to have put in a lower high this week, and dip-buying has now met its match in rip-selling. The program traders are dumping lots as they did not in March or April, even (scheduling via automation, I assume, as they had undoubtedly all headed out to the Hamptons or Mallorca for the long weekend) on a low-volume day like Friday.

But generally, I expect weakness to creep along, and for it to appear one stock at a time until the chasers are suitably chastened. Hence the value in stockpicking here, on both the short and long sides.

The setup I was looking for needed some steep and consistent rallying off March lows, and a very recent break of the ticker’s rally trendline, so that it’s in backtest/lower high mode. I will be looking to short these stocks if and only if they reconfirm a fail of the backtest. If they break convincingly back into their rally channel, I get stopped out. If they break down tomorrow and kiss the channel goodbye for good, I will consider them missed opportunities, and will not chase.

MFE-daily 2009-05-22An example of an earlier so confirmed version of the movement I’m describing (and still a good short I think, but that’s another story) can be seen in this $MFE chart. Note the colossal rippage over the last couple months, the weakening off the May 4 high, leading to the May 13 break of the trendline. (This is where the names I have chosen would now stand.) Three days of retesting that trendline and failing to break above it results in a new lower high on May 19 (the day I would have looked to short), and then a nice breakdown. Assuming a reasonable entry of just over 39, you would now be up about 0.80, or just over 2%, with some further weakness looking quite technically likely: a 5-day SMA below the 20-day and flat, fanning trendlines, etc. etc.

Before looking at the other names, a couple of notes: one, I am not a chartist, nor would I trade any more without charts. You may find some of my trendline drawing a little odd; I believe charts are messy and full of the error common to most endeavors of human folly, cataloguing the market version of which is this blog’s reason for being. So I draw them where they make sense to me; you should not take them as technical guidelines, “training”, or anything else.

Similarly, I will describe some possible setups here, but following them blindly would be very silly on your part. You are not in my head, you do not read charts or broader movements as I do, and of course you do not trade what I trade. I’m describing one way of seeing these charts. I do not even say these are trades I will take myself; I’m just interested in what looks like some very good low-risk/solid-return setups. My goal is to improve my perception; I hope you have a similar goal. Otherwise, you risk frustration should a trade backfire for reasons you have not anticipated.

And finally, these are not home-run shorts I’m looking for. Too much uncertainty, too much influence from the news and the spin, and too many jumpy buyers just make shorting and holding for indefinite targets seem too risky to me. Small gains on low risk and relatively short holding periods (under 8 days) is my current strategy.

ITT-daily 2009-05-22$ITT is, according to CAPS, “A multi-industry company engaged directly and through its subsidiaries in the design and manufacture of a range of engineered products and the provision of related services.” It did not actually rally as hard as my other picks, and it is headed into a zone of late-2008 congestion, but I like its lower high pre-break after reconfirming its 2009 earnings outlook, and would be surprised to see it clear that high again.

Entry on failed retest of trendline (~41.20) or, shorter-term/higher risk, failure to move above 5-day SMA (~40.50) T1 38.00 T2 37.00 T3 …

DPS-daily 2009-05-22Ah, $DPS. Who doesn’t need a nice refreshing beverage in the summer? Me. And, it would appear, what is left of the rally. Steep rise here, clean break and lower high. Though you could also make the case, I suppose, that it failed its breakout (note the strangeness of my trendline) and is merely falling back into an April consolidation zone. (If you’re like me, you don’t really believe anything consolidated in April, being as it was so much ether and shortness of breath, but I digress.) I like the weak-volume failed breakout and the higher selling volume, I like the sharp moves down off the recent highs as reflected in 5-day SMA action, I just plain like it.

Entry on failed retest around 22. T1 20-20.25 T2 200-day SMA T3 ~18.70 T4 17.30ish

HPQ-daily 2009-05-22$HPQ is to me the trickiest of the four, mainly because the Q’s look much less decisively weak than the S&P (after earlier weakening). I see all kinds of great technical reasons here–it has now broken two trendlines, has a nice double-top/failure at 200-day, down in the lower end of its congestion zone–and last week’s earnings and guidance were pretty grim–but if the Q’s caught fire I would dump this quickly. It’s that “name you can trust” problem. Investors love it when you lay off a bunch of people!

Entry around where trendline and 5-day meet, ~35 (as always, after a high is in, not on the way up). T1 33.50 T2 32.80 T3 30.00

$BF.B daily 2009Booze is a cliche rally favorite, and $BF.B (or $BF-B or $BF/B or whatever depending on your broker) is looking mighty tired. I find this the prettiest chart–note the blow-off top, the slow decline into longer-term trend break, the angle of the 5-day (under the 20-day, under the 200) , etc. etc. Link

But it also has the trickiest entry, as it has yet to put in a lower high over multiple days, and looks to be in a downward channel already. You might enter anywhere between Friday’s close and 46 or so. Careful! T1 ~44.40 T2 43.40 T3 …

Should I enter or exit these positions, it will be noted, approximately in real time, on twitter. I still anticipate very light trading on my part, so we shall see.

All charts marked up on FreeStockCharts. If you need a free charting resource, get over there and get plotting.

Good luck out there.

Advertisements

My main technical objection to this rally (for fundamental objections, see pretty much the whole blog) since its second or third week has been its refusal to back and fill. The flat days and pullbacks have been few and far between, and the couple of strong selloff days since March have been followed up by furious buying. The markets have been irrational for a long while now, and anyone who will tell you that they’re panicking up any more rationally than they’ve been panicking down is a fool. The danger is that while investing consumers–who after all are supposed to benefit from the wisdom of institutional traders, which is why they pay their salaries and ridiculous bonuses–get hurt when the market drops, they risk to get hurt a lot more if they mistake a sucker’s rally for the real thing. I believe that companies doing, say, outsized program trading might be goosing this thing along to take advantage of precisely such suckerness. I’d rather people’s existing holdings get hurt further than that they get deluded into holding more at this point in our “recovery”. Full disclosure: I care more about real people getting screwed by trader activity than about traders’ bottom lines. (Even yours!)

But I digress. Whether the tape lies or not, whether endless upness without building real support is characteristic of bear market rallies or not, blah blah blah, for anything other than a short- to intermediate-term trade I’m looking for stubborn independence in a stock’s movement, and in the underlying company’s business. I’m looking for the non-nonsense. It’s an obvious fact that some companies really have bottomed, regardless of what you expect the market to do. It’s anyone’s guess which companies those are, and I’m not in the habit of making those calls, but I like a safe bet, if only as a nice idle thought in the midst of so much meaningless volatility. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not really a fundamentals guy, or at least not with any more weight than I give sentiment, and the chart still rules. But in the case of Powerwave, all three look pretty strong to me.

Powerwave is a telecom sector play. They operate worldwide, making all sorts of infrastructure components for PCS, 3G, and 4G networks, a reliable growth field (not that I need to point that out), especially as several U.S. carriers have committed to 4G. Their customer base is OEM manufacturers and wireless network operators. They’ve had three tough years as infrastructure demand has been all over the place, but as their 10-K from March 2009 details, they’ve taken the cue, began restructuring in 2006, and in particular spent the last half of 2008 getting leaner and meaner. They are expected to take further losses from that reorganization this quarter, but an average of analyst estimates (I don’t give a shit, but you might) show them with positive earnings on 2009, doubling in 2010.

I like this as a smartphone play, a stimulus/infrastructure play, and a tech-edge/trend play. In short, there are lots of reasons to like this, which is what I look for before classifying something as a long-term trade (>2 months to target) or (yikes!) an “investment”.

PWAV daily

As for the charts (it’s huge, click to see), to me they look great. Sure, the same v-shaped recovery we’ve seen in the rest of the nonsense rally, but that has given way to almost a full month of sideways action, with one nice push up on 3x volume a week ago, and prices holding steady since, despite some very turbulent broader market action. As a small cap (132M shares) they’re not expected to tightly correlate to the markets, and while as I said I’m not in the call-making business I expect them to hold up well in what I am still fairly sure will be the coming weeks’ pullback/retest of lows. Note that earnings as reported by their sector ($AAPL, $RIMM, $NOK, $T, $VZ) are looking pretty darn rosy, all things considered. People with money to spend are hooked on the smartphone “lifestyle”. They are going to huff 4G like glue.

Over at CAPS you can pick up a nice summary of current sentiment and all sorts of stats and history on the company. Also available Yahoo (blech), MarketWatch (meh), and Google (yay!) style. Note that the CAPS user recommendations are quite outdated, but current analyst projections at MarketWatch look up to date. Plenty of news and PR links available at the three portal sites.

Near-term price resistance at $0.90, if you’re waiting for the next breakout. And they report earnings Monday, May 4 if you prefer to wait for the news. Should they “fail to meet expectations”, I’ll be taking that as a buying opportunity. And should they beat, I’ll be taking it much the same way.

Disclosure/Conclusion: Pretty damn long $PWAV. Lookin’ to get longer.